Sri Lanka in changing the world order: together with BRICS

Abstract

The existing world order does not demonstrate the true features of either a unipolar system in which a sole superpower controls everything by itself or a multipolar system in which several states have equal power to maintain the world arena. Though the current world order is not very much clear, it has the common argument of not reflecting geopolitical realities and being highly centred towards the developed western powers. Against this unbalance, the developing force has raised their considerable voice, by demanding a more democratic change in the world order. In this context, as giant emerging economies and regional leaders Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa together as BRICS have now gained the spotlight in the world arena. This is not only due to the economic and trade aspects of this group, but also due to their political and other security means in changing the world order. BRICS is recognized by the world today as a strong group optimistically strong enough to make a considerable pressure in the world politics. On the other hand, Sri Lanka as a pioneer state that defeated terrorism and is located in a strategic position in the Indian Ocean, she always demands that the current international institutions should adopt a more democratic approach. Therefore, it is clear that both BRICS and Sri Lanka hold similar objectives regarding certain matters. In fact, Sri Lanka keeps strong bilateral relations with all the BRICS states. This study examines whether Sri Lanka is able to make a noticeable impact in changing the world order together with BRICS. Furthermore, this study will discuss how Sri Lanka should keep multilateral relations with BRICS and how she can go forward as the hub of Asia together with BRICS in changing the existing world order into a more democratic multipolar world. This research was mainly an archival based one. Both primary and secondary data were gathered. Primary data were collected through declarations, joint statements and recorded speeches while secondary data were through online journal articles, reviews, printed books and reports.