• Login
    • University Home
    • Library Home
    • Lib Catalogue
    • Advance Search
    View Item 
    •   IR@KDU Home
    • INTERNATIONAL RESEARCH CONFERENCE ARTICLES (KDU IRC)
    • 2018 IRC Articles
    • Management, Social Sciences & Humanities
    • View Item
    •   IR@KDU Home
    • INTERNATIONAL RESEARCH CONFERENCE ARTICLES (KDU IRC)
    • 2018 IRC Articles
    • Management, Social Sciences & Humanities
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Critical Review of Literature on Giving Corrective Feedback in Tesol Sessions

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    IRC2018(317-322).pdf (708.1Kb)
    Date
    2018
    Author
    Abeyawickrama, Wimansha
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Giving corrective feedback in classes has widely been discussed in Second Language Acquisition focusing on the requirement of the feedback and the types of feedback based on the time and the purpose of providing them. The relevant literature has identified six types of feedback: explicit correction, recast, clarification request, metalinguistic feedback, elicitation and repetition. These are categorized mainly into two groups: explicit feedback and implicit feedback. It is believed that both types have their own advantages and disadvantages. This paper first highlights the difference between explicit and implicit feedback prior to critically evaluating the advantages and disadvantages of both taking the research finding into account. The discussion of explicit and implicit feedback as corrective feedback methods still leaves questions with the classification of feedback types as 'explicit` and 'implicit`. The discussion of research findings indicates that explicit feedback has an edge over the implicit feedback based on the benefits that they bring to second language learners. SLA theories also support the effectiveness of explicit feedback over implicit feedback. The empirical studies highlight that metalinguistic feedback is more useful than implicit methods such as recasts.
    URI
    http://ir.kdu.ac.lk/handle/345/2663
    Collections
    • Management, Social Sciences & Humanities [64]

    Library copyright © 2017  General Sir John Kotelawala Defence University, Sri Lanka
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
     

     

    Browse

    All of IR@KDUCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsFacultyDocument TypeThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsFacultyDocument Type

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Library copyright © 2017  General Sir John Kotelawala Defence University, Sri Lanka
    Contact Us | Send Feedback