Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorIlyas, FZ
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-13T08:04:29Z
dc.date.available2024-03-13T08:04:29Z
dc.date.issued2023-09
dc.identifier.urihttp://ir.kdu.ac.lk/handle/345/7316
dc.description.abstractThe Duty to give reasons for a decision is a part of the Audi alteram partem, which is indispensable in administrative law. Earlier, the principles of natural justice did not include any general rule that reasons should be given for decision by administrative authorities. Therefore, failure to give reasons has not been considered as a violation of natural justice principles. Nevertheless, this approach changed from time to time. This study analyzes the previous and new approaches in Sri Lanka, especially with reference to current Sri Lankan university cases compared to United Kingdom (UK) and Indian jurisdictions. In this research, the changes of the duty to provide reasons for a decision by administrative authorities, violation of principles of natural justice, right to equality, and right to information have been discussed. In this research, both primary and secondary sources are attracted to follow the Doctrinal and Comparative research methods. Finally, this research study analyzes the development of administratively affiliated judgments in Sri Lanka with special reference to university cases in other comparative jurisdictions such as the United Kingdom and India. Whereas, Sri Lanka has developed in administrative jurisdiction compared to main common law countries such as India and the UKen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectAdministrative Lawen_US
dc.subjectNatural justiceen_US
dc.subjectAudi alteram partemen_US
dc.subjectDuty to give reasons for decisionen_US
dc.subjectUniversity Casesen_US
dc.titleA Comparative Analysis of Duty to Reason Giving in Administrative Lawen_US
dc.typeArticle Full Texten_US
dc.identifier.facultyFaculty of Lawen_US
dc.identifier.pgnos109-115en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record