| dc.description.abstract | Recent reports published in Sri Lankan newspapers suggest that local industries (particularly Cinnamon producers) have raised concerns about the lack of a registration system for Geographical Indications (GIs) in Sri Lanka. They have even gone on to suggest that the failure on the part of Sri Lankan authorities and stakeholders to obtain protection of Sri Lankan GIs in other jurisdictions (and in particular the European Union)
is attributable to the lack of a domestic mechanism for the registration of GIs. Both local industries and academics have made reference to the Indian approach
on the registration and protection of GIs and have called for the implementation of a similar system in Sri Lanka. It was in order to address this specific concern and plea
that the Cabinet of Ministers by a decision made in October 2016 pledged to amend the Intellectual Property Act 2003 (IP Act), which governs the protection and
enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights in Sri Lanka. Yet, contrary to expectations and adopting an approach that is much less comprehensive than the existing
legislative approach in India, the proposed amendment to the IP Act merely introduces a single sub-section to s161 that deals with the protection of GIs. In this
backdrop, this paper deals with the following points. First, the paper considers whether the current regime for the protection of GIs in Sri Lanka is sufficient in order to
obtain the necessary legal protection for Sri Lankan GIs both locally and globally. Second, the paper critically assesses the new amendment to the IP Act, comparing it
with the Indian approach, in considering its practicality and utility. It is argued that the new amendment adds nothing to existing law. | en_US |
